Skip to content

information

Canada wants to ban Fear of Islam which means “Islamophobia” – Persecuted Christians in Pakistan and Egypt are forgotten

 

 

We must never forget about the persecuted Christians in the Muslim world.
There is an attempt in the West to criminalize criticism of Islam.
The Canadian prime minister wants to ban “Islamophobia” which means fear of Islam.
It will soon be a crime in Canada to talk about the brutal persecution of Christians by Muslims in the Muslim world under sharia law.
Christians in the Muslim world live in constant fear and no one in the media or even in the UN seems to care.
Christians in Pakistan, Egypt, Iraq, Syria and Iran are attacked daily and no one hears about it.
Christians are the world’s most persecuted religious group, but the media ignores it in order not to harm the image of Islam.
Why doesn’t the world seem to care when Christians die?
Why is it that When Christians are murdered and persecuted en masse, no one seems to care — not even other Christians?

 

 

If you want to know what is happening to Christians in Pakistan Please watch the video down below.
The Christian human rights activist, George Naz delivers a message to the Muslims of Pakistan; “You burn my Bible every day. You destroy my Cross every day. You burn my Christian brothers and sisters alive on daily basis. Let´s not forget Gojra´s incident. The Christian residence premises in Joseph Colony Lahore were burnt. Church in Peshawar was attacked. Shanti Nagar´s incident as well. How many more such incidents shall we talk about? You are being so cruel with us by burning our Bibles and Cross.
A Christian couple was burnt alive in Kot Radha Kishan. 3 lives were snatched as the woman was pregnant. It is often said that Christians in Pakistan are safe and face no problems at all. This is the real condition of Christians. And this is what our Muslim brothers are doing to us. Until when we shall be oppressed? For God´s sake please do something for us.”

 

 

 

 

The brutal persecution of non-Muslim minorities throughout the Middle East, Asia and Africa has become genocide.
But the Canadian government cares more about the image of Islam.

Posted by ‎Support Israel – תמיכה בישראל‎ on Friday, April 20, 2018

 

**************************************************

 

Watch: Nikki Haley says the UN is a useless, Biased & pro-Islamic organization which is dominated by the Muslim world

 

 

 

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley delivers remarks at a UN Security Council meeting.
Every two and a half minutes US pays UN $38,000 for doing nothing
American taxpayers pay more than any other country for the UN budget.

The UN is a useless organization which is dominated by countries like Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Iran and Cuba etc.
Saudi Arabia beheads women, Iran stones them but the UN condemns Israel.

There are 193 countries in the UN So why are the American taxpayers funding most of its budget?
Please watch and share this video if you think Trump should cut all the American aid to the UN.

The United Nations has been hijacked by Islamic countries that use UN bodies to attack Israel.
Trump should cut all American aid to the UN.

 

 

 

Britain, the US and Australia should stop funding the UN.
The U.N. General Assembly elected Qatar, Congo and Pakistan to its top human rights body, joining existing members such as Saudi Arabia, China, Cuba and Venezuela.

Countries that practice Sharia laws have been chosen to be human rights watchdogs.
Even a country like Iran has been given a seat in the UN Human Rights Council.

Iran Where women are stoned to death, where gays are executed in a public square.
Christians are brutally persecuted in the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Pastors are jailed for no reason, no reason other than for being Christian leaders. Christians have been lashed for sipping wine during prayer services; Christians have been brutally tortured for doing nothing more than practicing their faith.

Saudi Arabia is the head of the Human Rights Council, a country where there are no Christian citizens, even Christian migrant workers are persecuted by the authorities if they practice their religion.

No religion is allowed to exist in Saudi Arabia except Islam, anyone who leaves Islam is executed.

Pakistan is the worst country for Christians to live in.

Under sharia blasphemy law Muslims murder Christians on false charges of insulting the Prophet Muhammad and the Koran.

These countries are kidnapping the UN bodies to push the anti-Israel and anti-Western agenda.
They use the United Nations to attack Israel which is the only democratic state in the Middle East where Christians are free and women are not considered citizens in rank.

In the last two years Benjamin Netanyahu cut 90% of Israeli aid to the UN after U.N.’s Cultural Agency passed a resolution denying the Jewish and Christian connection to Jerusalem.

Western countries should follow Israel – Cut all funding & Announce Withdrawal From U.N.

 

 

 

Do you agree with every single word she said? Yes or No

Posted by ‎Support Israel – תמיכה בישראל‎ on Sunday, April 15, 2018

 

*********************************************

 

 

 

 

 

Hungary: Secretary of state Trashes the EU “We will not open our doors to illegal immigrants”

Poland, Hungary and Slovakia don’t want Immigration policy imposed on their countries by Merkel.
Every country has the right to defend itself by closing its borders and deporting illegal immigrants back to where they came from.

Most of the immigrants who arrive in Europe are not refugees, they are illegal immigrants from the Middle East, Asia and Africa who want to start a “new life” in Europe.

The Hungarian economy can not provide welfare payments and free housing for millions of illegal immigrants from the Middle East.

Hungary should close its borders and deport illegal immigrants back to where they came from.

The German government expects to spend around 93.6 billion euros by the end of 2020 on costs related to the refugee crisis.
Its the impact on housing, healthcare, the rising costs of welfare, schools that are brought under horrific burdens trying to teach an influx of children who don’t speak the Language yet fill up the classrooms and competing for already scarce jobs with workers who are willing to take less money for the same job – these are the day to day burgeoning effects of mass immigration.

Populism has ONLY arisen because the elites of Europe have neglected their duty towards the very people that put them in power.

Instead of serving the people they have falsely assumed mastery over them and the people will simply not stand for it.
The only solution to the immigration crisis is to close the borders and deport illegal immigrants back to where they came from.

Most of the immigrants who arrived in Germany are not refugees from Syria. They are Muslim immigrants from Africa, Asia and the Middle East who exploited the flow of immigrants from Syria to invade Europe as “refugees.”
Multiculturalism has failed in Europe.

Most people are unaware of the consequences of the illegal mass immigration into Europe that lead to the changing face of Europe.

There are Western countries that do not even acknowledge that there is a lack of integration within the immigrant communities.

The Western world must close the borders before it is too late.

 

Poland, Hungary and Slovakia don’t want Immigration policy imposed on their countries by Merkel.

Posted by ‎Support Israel – תמיכה בישראל‎ on Wednesday, April 11, 2018

 

 

*************

 

How Rockefeller Founded Big Pharma And Waged War On Natural Cures..

How Rockefeller Founded Big Pharma And Waged War On Natural Cures


“How Big Oil Conquered the World” is a brilliant piece of investigative journalism presented by James Corbett,1 revealing the immense extent to which the oil industry has shaped and is ruling the world as we know it.
“From farm to pharmaceutical, diesel truck to dinner plate, pipeline to plastic product, it is impossible to think of an area of our modern-day lives that is not affected by the petrochemical industry.
The story of oil is the story of the modern world. And this is the story of those who helped shape that world, and how the oil-igarchy they created is on the verge of monopolizing life itself.”

Corbett carefully details the sordid back story of today’s “oiligarchy.” While most people are well-acquainted with the Rockefeller name, few probably know the true history of the Rockefellers’ rise to power.

Big Oil — An Industry Founded on Treachery and Deceit

As noted by Corbett, certain details of the Big Oil story are well known. Others are more obscure. The story begins in rural New York state in the early 19th century, with William Avery Rockefeller, an authentic “snake oil salesman” going by the fictional name of “Dr. Bill Livingston.”
While neither a doctor nor a cancer specialist, Rockefeller, aka “Dr. Livingston,” aka “Devil Bill,” traveled the country’s back roads conning people into buying his “Rock Oil” tonic for cancer — “a useless mixture of laxative and petroleum that had no effect whatsoever,” according to Corbett.

Get your Free copy of The Wicked Good Ketogenic Diet Cookbook
This free cookbook is jampacked with 148 delicious ketogenic recipes that will help you burn fat like crazy!
William Avery Rockefeller fathered numerous children with three women, and took the name Livingston after being indicted for rape in 1849. One of those children was John D. Rockefeller, who became the world’s first billionaire after founding Standard Oil.
As noted by Corbett:
“When he wasn’t running away from them or disappearing for years at a time, [William Avery Rockefeller] would teach his children the tricks of his treacherous trade. He once bragged of his parenting technique: ‘I cheat my boys every chance I get. I want to make ’em sharp’ …
The world we live in today is the world created in ‘Devil’ Bill’s image. It’s a world founded on treachery, deceit, and the naïveté of a public that has never wised up to the parlor tricks that the Rockefellers and their ilk have been using to shape the world for the past century and a half.”

The Birth of the Oil Industry

Another character with a similarly dubious background is “Colonel” Edwin Drake, an unemployed railroad conductor who managed to secure himself a job with the Pennsylvania Rock Oil Company after running into the founders, George Bissell and James Townsend, at a hotel.
The title “Colonel” was bestowed on him by Bissell and Townsend, who thought it might help him “win the respect of the locals” as he went about the company’s business, collecting Seneca oil, which the company distilled into kerosene (lamp oil).
His mission was to collect enough Seneca oil to make the business profitable — a task that turned out to be more difficult than expected, as mere gallons could be collected using the standard collection methods.
Eventually, he tried drilling through the shale bedrock to reach greater reservoirs of oil, and on August 28, 1859 — literally the day he’d used up the last of his funds — the oil began to flow from the ground. And with that, a new industry was born.
It didn’t take long before homes and factories around the world were using lamp oil refined from crude, and prospectors from around the country flocked to Pennsylvania in search of the “black gold.”
Among them was John D. Rockefeller, a Cleveland bookkeeper who, according to Corbett, had two ambitions in life: “To make $100,000 and to live to 100 years old.” With a $1,000 loan from his father, “Devil Bill,” John D. Rockefeller set off to make his fortune.

The Standard Oil Monopoly

After a series of partnerships and mergers over a seven-year period, John D. Rockefeller eventually incorporated Standard Oil of Ohio in 1870. According to the report:
“The next year, he quietly put what he called ‘our plan’ — his campaign to dominate the volatile oil industry — into devastating effect. Rockefeller knew that the refiner with the lowest transportation cost could bring rivals to their knees.
He entered into a secret alliance with the railroads, called the South Improvement Company. In exchange for large, regular shipments, Rockefeller and his allies secured transport rates far lower than those of their bewildered competitors.
Ida Tarbell, the daughter of an oil man, later remembered how men like her father struggled to make sense of events: ‘An uneasy rumor began running up and down the Oil Regions,’ she wrote.
‘Freight rates were going up. … Moreover … all members of the South Improvement Company — a company unheard of until now — were exempt. … On every lip there was but one word and that was ‘conspiracy.’”
By the time he was 40, John D. Rockefeller controlled 90 percent of the global oil refineries. Within another few years (early 1880s), he also controlled 90 percent of the marketing of oil, and one-third of all oil wells. His power and influence cannot be overstated at this point.
He had an international monopoly on what was to become the most important commodity in the world economy.
Following in Rockefeller’s footsteps were a handful of other wealthy families, including the Nobels, the Rothschilds, the Dutch Royal family, and millionaire William Knox D’arcy, who was the first to strike oil in Persia.
These early “oil barons” became enormously wealthy. And as billions of people became increasingly dependent on oil for virtually every aspect of life, they gained tremendous power and influence.
However, oil could have been replaced by other resources, were it not for the shrewd manipulation by these early “oiligarchs.”

The Death of the Electric Car, and Other Lucky Breaks

The advent of the electric light bulb took a good chunk out of the lamp oil market and temporarily threatened the oil monopoly. But lamp oil was quickly replaced by the need for gasoline to run the two-stroke internal combustion engine, invented by German engineer Karl Benz.
In 1888, Benz Motorwagen became the first commercially available automobile, and with that, the petroleum industry’s profits were again secured. But even then their ongoing monopoly was not guaranteed. The first electric car had been built in 1884, and by 1897, electric cars were gaining popularity in London. In the early 20th century, 28 percent of cars sold in the U.S. were also electric. As noted by Corbett:
“The electrics had advantages over the internal combustion engine: they required no gear shifting or hand cranking, and had none of the vibration, smell or noise associated with gasoline-powered cars. Lady Luck intervened again on January 10, 1901, when prospectors struck oil at Spindletop in East Texas.
The gusher blew 100,000 barrels a day and set off the next great oil boom, providing cheap, plentiful oil to the American market and driving down gas prices. It wasn’t long before the expensive, low range electric engines were abandoned altogether and big, loud, gas-guzzling engines came to dominate the road …”
Interestingly, the event that made John D. Rockefeller into the world’s first billionaire was supposed to rein in his unbridled power. He’d come under intense scrutiny as his wealth increased and, on May 15, 1911, the U.S. Supreme Court declared Standard Oil a monopoly “in restraint of trade” and ordered its dissolution.
But by dissolving the company into multiple entities, shares of Standard Oil tripled in value, and in a few short years, Rockefeller’s worth equaled nearly 2 percent of the total U.S. economy.
“For the oiligarchy, the lesson of the rise and rise of Rockefeller was obvious: the more ruthlessly that monopoly was pursued, the tighter that control was grasped, the greater the lust for power and money, the greater the reward would be in the end. From now on, no invention would derail the oil majors from their quest for total control. No competition would be tolerated. No threat to the oiligarchs would be allowed to rise.”

The Continued Squashing of Competition

While the electric car had been successfully eliminated, thereby securing Big Oil profits, another competing resource was on the horizon: alcohol.
Henry Ford designed his Model T automobile to run on either gasoline or alcohol, stating that just about anything that could be fermented could be used for fuel, predicting the future of fuel was wide open to a number of alternatives. However, the oil industry succeeded in eliminating the competition yet again, this time by supporting the anti-alcohol movements and the formation of the Prohibition Party in 1869.
While Rockefeller avoided alcohol, his chief concern was not to uphold morality in the U.S. The prohibition served his agenda by creating burdensome restrictions on ethanol producers, and as ethanol became more costly, its attraction as an alternate fuel ceased.
Also, as detailed in my previous article about Clair Patterson’s fight to eliminate leaded gasoline, once the high compression engine was invented, car manufacturers started running into performance problems. General Motors diagnosed the problem, realizing that the problem originated with the fuel. General Motors tried about 15,000 different combinations of elements to find a solution to the engine knocking.




Adding benzene from coal to gasoline was found to work. Ditto for adding grain alcohol. Adding 10 percent alcohol to gasoline raised the quality of the fuel, causing less knocking in the engine. It also had other benefits, including clean combustion, which eliminated soot emissions, and increased horsepower without engine knocking.
But as research continued, General Motors determined that adding lead to the gasoline produced “an ideal anti-knock fuel” — ideal mostly because manufacturing the lead additive, tetraethyl lead, would allow them to make the greatest profits. Were they to add alcohol to the gasoline, the oil industry stood to lose a large amount of petroleum sales, anywhere from 10 to 20 percent, depending on how much alcohol was added.
By adding lead, the oil industry had a product it could again control in its entirety. So Standard Oil partnered with General Motors, creating a joint corporation known as Ethyl Corporation. Leaded gasoline became the norm, and over the next 80 years, countless people were sickened and harmed by this neurotoxic fuel additive, thrust upon the people for no other reason than it created the greatest profits.

Big Oil Secretly Buys Up and Dismantles Public Transportation System

In 1936, Standard Oil and General Motors also took part in the reformation of public transportation. Only 10 percent of Americans owned a car, and most city dwellers relied on electric trolley networks. By replacing the electric streetcars with gasoline-guzzling buses, the oil industry secured an even greater foothold within the U.S. economy. As detailed in Corbett’s report:
“The cartel had been careful to hide their involvement in National City Lines, but it was revealed to the public in 1946 by … Edwin J. Quinby … He uncovered the oiligarchs’ stock ownership of National City Lines and its subsidiaries and detailed how they had step by step bought up and destroyed the public transportation lines in Baltimore, Los Angeles, St. Louis and other major urban centres…
[I]n 1947 National City Lines was indicted for conspiring to form a transportation monopoly and conspiring to monopolize sales of buses and supplies. In 1949, GM, Firestone, Standard Oil of California and their officers and corporate associates were convicted on the second count of conspiracy.
The punishment for buying up and dismantling America’s public transportation infrastructure? A $5,000 fine. H. C. Grossman, who had been the director of Pacific City Lines when it oversaw the scrapping of LA’s $100 million Pacific Electric system, was fined exactly $1.”
Next came the undermining of the railway system. In 1953, General Motor President Charles Wilson was appointed Secretary of Defense, and Wilson, along with Francis DuPont, Chief Administrator of Federal Highways, set into motion the largest public works project in U.S. history with the creation of the interstate highway system.
As a result, railway travel declined by 84 percent between 1945 and 1964, while private car ownership soared, and along with it, gasoline sales, which rose 300 percent in that same time frame. Similar social engineering feats took place in Europe, further securing the future of the oil business as a primary force to be reckoned with.
The report also goes into the details behind the gas shortages that sent the U.S. into a financial tailspin in the early 1970s, revealing how the secretive Bilderberg Group, created by Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands in 1954, successfully created a new financial system based on the petrodollar — a system that granted the oiligarchs unprecedented control over the economy.

The Rockefeller Transformation

In his day, John D. Rockefeller was a despised man. This all changed when he hired Ivy Ledbetter Lee, who essentially invented the public relations industry as we now know it.  John D. was filmed handing out dimes to the poor, and was publicly portrayed as a kind and warm-hearted man. While hokey by today’s standards, such simple stunts worked. Yet, Rockefeller needed to go even further to truly gain the public’s trust.
As Corbett notes:
“In order to win the public over, he was going to have to give them what they wanted. And what they wanted wasn’t difficult to understand: money. But just as his father, Devil Bill, had taught him to do in all his business dealings, Rockefeller made sure to get the better end of the bargain. He would ‘donate’ his great wealth to the creation of public institutions, but those institutions would be used to bend society to his will.
As every would-be ruler throughout history has realized, society has to be transformed from the ground up. Americans in the 19th century still prized education and intellectual pursuits … with a remarkable 93 to 100 percent literacy rate.
Before the first compulsory schooling laws in Massachusetts in 1852, education was private and decentralized, and as a result … a solid grounding in history and science was widespread. But a nation of individuals who could think for themselves was an anathema to the monopolists. The oiligarchs needed a mass of obedient workers…”

The Takeover of Education

John D. Rockefeller’s first great act of charity was the establishment of the University of Chicago, followed later by a $180 million donation to the establishment of the General Education Board. But contrary to what you might think, these acts of generosity were not to further education, but to control and impoverish it.
Frederick Taylor Gates became a trusted ally, and in “The Country School of Tomorrow,” Gates lays out Rockefeller’s plan for the education of future Americans:
“In our dream, we have limitless resources, and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hand. The present educational conventions fade from our minds; and, unhampered by tradition, we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning or science.
We are not to raise up from among them authors, orators, poets, or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians. Nor will we cherish even the humbler ambition to raise up from among them lawyers, doctors, preachers, politicians, statesmen, of whom we now have ample supply.”

The Effective Strategy That Eliminated Natural Medicine

Other oil-backed schemes to mold and reshape the American education system followed, including a scheme to alter the teaching of American history to promote a view of collectivism, as well as a program culminating in the transformation of the practice of medicine.
Naturopathic-based herbal medicine was the norm, and Rockefeller set out to shift the medical industry toward using oil-derived pharmaceuticals. To this end, the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research was established in 1901, headed up by Simon Flexner.
“His brother, Abraham, was an educator who was contracted by the Carnegie Foundation to write a report on the state of the American medical education system. His study, ‘The Flexner Report,’ along with the hundreds of millions of dollars that the Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations were to shower on medical research in the coming years, resulted in a sweeping overhaul of the American medical system.
Naturopathic and homeopathic medicine, medical care focused on unpatentable, uncontrollable natural remedies and cures was now dismissed as quackery; only drug-based allopathic medicine requiring expensive medical procedures and lengthy hospital stays was to be taken seriously …
The fortunes of Carnegie, Morgan and Rockefeller financed surgery, radiation and synthetic drugs. They were to become the economic foundations of the new medical economy … The oiligarchy birthed entire medical industries from their own research centers and then sold their own products from their own petrochemical companies as the ‘cure.’”

The Takeover of America’s Financial System and the Creation of a Food Monopoly

The financial power of these oil industry giants is by now near-unfathomable, but the aim was to control the entire financial system. This was effectively accomplished with the creation of the Federal Reserve, established in 1913 following a secret meeting on Jekyll Island, during which the details were ironed out. Attendants at this meeting included John D. Rockefeller Jr.’s father-in-law, Senator Nelson Aldrich, and various banking representatives.
Later, in the 1950s, James Stillman Rockefeller, the grandson of John D.’s brother, became the head of National City Bank, while David Rockefeller, John D.’s grandson, took over Chase Manhattan Bank. Still, they were not satisfied.
“Springboarding from success to success as they consolidated monopolies across every field of human activity, the oiligarchs’ ambitions became even larger. This time, their goal was to consolidate control over the very food supply of the world itself, and once again they would use philanthropy as the cover for their business takeover,” Corbett explains.
The Rockefeller Foundation funded the Green Revolution that led to the introduction of petroleum-based agricultural chemicals, which quickly transformed agriculture, both in the U.S. and abroad. President Lyndon Johnson’s “Food for Peace” program actually mandated the use of petroleum-dependent technologies and chemicals by aid recipients, and countries that could not afford it were granted loans from the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.
The “Gene Revolution” was next, and as noted by Corbett:
“The players involved in this ‘Gene Revolution’ are almost identical to the players in the Green Revolution, with I.G. Farben offshoots Bayer CropScience and BASF Plant Science mingling with traditional oiligarch associate companies like Dow AgroScience, DuPont Biotechnology and, of course, Monsanto, all funded by the Rockefeller Foundation …”

The Final End Game: Monopolizing Life

In his usual style, Corbett manages to squeeze in an incredible amount of information in as compact a timeframe as is humanly possible, and I highly recommend taking the time to watch the video in full. What I’ve included here is but a summary overview of the many details he brings forth in this fascinating report.
Those who are ignorant of history are bound to repeat it, and if this story tells us anything, it is that unless we realize what has been done, we’ll be deceived again and again, because the oil oligarchy’s end game is yet to be realized — if we let them. As Corbett notes in closing:
“The takeover of education, of medicine, of the monetary system, of the food supply itself, showed that the aim was much greater than a mere oil monopoly: it was the quest to monopolize all aspects of life, to erect the perfect system of control over every aspect of society, every sector from which any threat of competition to their power could emerge … But the oiligarchs are not done yet.
Their next project, launched in the late 20th century, is almost too ambitious to be comprehended … It is about the monopolization of life itself. They have spent decades preparing the path for this takeover and marshaled their mind-boggling resources in service of the task. And the vast majority of the world’s population, still playing the shell game that the oiligarchs perfected and abandoned long ago, are about to fall right into their hands yet again.”




SOURCE

———————————————————————————–

About Me

My photo

TradCatKnight

Eagle of the Fortress. Welcome to the New Crusade of the Immaculate and Sacred Hearts

http://gloria.tv/?user=187983

facebook.com/tradcatknights

tradcatknight.blogspot.com

tradcatknight.tumblr.com

pinterest.com/ericgajewski71/

twitter.com/TradCatKnight

google.com/+EricGajewski

youtube.com/user/tradcatknights

tradcatknight.freeforums.net/

View my complete profile

Mexican Senate Takes Aim at the US!

In response to President Trump’s decision to send National Guard troops to the border, the Mexican Senate convened and showed their true colors. They seem to think that America trying to protect her borders is an “offense” against Mexico!?!?!?


Reports state from El Universal:


“Despite everything that is at stake in the relationship between our two countries, the way in which President Donald Trump has behaved is, for the Mexican people, unacceptable and intolerable.


The resolution demands that President Trump respect the people of Mexico, and notes the Senate “condemns the unfounded and offensive expressions about Mexico and Mexicans and the treatment that is needed for a relationship between neighboring countries, partners, and allies.”


Among their “solutions” are the ideas to stop helping the US with Cartels crossing the border, and to stop helping deal with illegal immigrants from crossing the border. Are they serious?


If the Mexican government had truly been helping with these aspects anyway, there would not be a need to send the National Guard down there. And if we do have the national guard on the border…It WILL reduce the number of illegal crossings and drugs crossings.


How can we know this for sure? Because when Presidents Bush and Obama did the exact same thing, border crossings and drug traffic went down. It works, we know it works, and here’s the kicker…Mexico knows it works too…And that’s why they don’t want it.




Watch: Muslims in Britain threaten to behead those who criticize Islam!

 

 

Watch: Muslims in Britain say they reject the values of the United Kingdom, which includes freedom of speech.


They say they prefer to impose Shari’a laws and force everyone to obey Islam.
According to sharia laws:


– There is no freedom of religion or freedom of speech.
– There is no equality between people (the non-Muslim is not equal to the Muslim).
– There are no equal rights for men and women.
– There is no democracy or a separation between religion and state politics.


Sharia is incompatible with Western values.


The Western world must close its borders, deport illegal immigrants, and ban the Sharia laws.

 

 

Liberals and leftists in the West use the made up term “Islamophobia” to portray anyone who criticizes Islam as a “racist”.


Radical Muslim terrorists all over the world carry out terror attacks “in the name of Allah”.
They justify their violence by quoting verses from the Quran.


Islamophobia is a made up word created by the Muslim Brotherhood specifically to silence debate.


Liberals and leftists ignore the fact that Islam is an ideology that has nothing to do with race.


Islamophobia is a neologism created to silence any possible debate about the problems Islamic extremism has got with modernity, with the intention of using the collective post-colonial “guilt” to exempt a particular set of beliefs from scrutiny, analysis and criticism.


It’s a buzzword used in an attempt to silence anyone, whenever had legit questions or criticisms about the religion.


Islam is not a race. It’s Not a religion.

There is an attempt in the West to impose a sharia-blasphemy law to criminalize criticism of Islam.


It started when Saudi Arabia and Muslim countries tried to pass a UN resolution to force Western states to criminalize criticism of Islam.


The Parliament in Canada passed “Motion M-103” to condemn the so-called “Islamophobia (Fear of Islam)” in a preparation for a blasphemy law in Canada.


According to the sharia blasphemy law anyone who criticizes Islam or the Prophet Muhammad should be killed.


Under Sharia blasphemy law in Saudi Arabia and Iran Muslims are executed if they are accused of blasphemy.


In Pakistan, the situation is even worse, radical Muslims use the blasphemy law to persecute the Christian minority.


Is this the law the liberals in the West want to adopt?


If you think Sharia blasphemy law has no place in the West, share this post!

 

 

 

 

Should he resign? Yes or No

Posted by ‎Support Israel – תמיכה בישראל‎ on Wednesday, April 4, 2018

 

***********

 

 

 

 

 

 

WATCH: Liberal Media Horrified as YouTube Witness Goes Off Script!!!!!!!!!!!!

The man went off the media’s script, but he was speaking for millions.

In the immediate aftermath of any catastrophe, initial witness accounts are almost always distorted. Perceptions skewed by panic end up being corrected when the smoke clears.

But the words of one witness present during Tuesday’s shooting at YouTube headquarters in San Bruno, California, were true at the moment he spoke them — and gun grabbers and the mainstream media had to be horrified.

The moment came when an unidentified man told a KTVU reporter what was going through his mind as the crime took place — and it wasn’t more laws for abridging Second Amendment freedoms.

It was a desperate wish that he had the means to defend himself in his hands, at that moment.

 

It wasn’t what the plotline the media has been pushing since the Feb. 14 shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas in Parkland, Florida.

It wasn’t David Hogg and the other sudden celebrity “survivors” being used to unleash a wave of anti-gun hysteria. But it was exactly what most Americans can relate to.

Check it out here.

 

 

“I didn’t have a gun on me, but wish I did.”

Tuesday’s shooting left three victims wounded and a woman identified as San Diego resident Nasim Najafi Aghdam dead of a self-inflicted gunshot, according to ABC News.

After an event like this, the media “narrative” is supposed to include weeping witnesses, preferably outraged that the United States is a free country where citizens are allowed to arm themselves.

Reporters are supposed to find victims railing about how it was all the fault of Republicans and the National Rifle Association that anyone had a gun besides the police, the military and the numerous security agencies under control of the federal government that maintain armies of their own.

RELATED: London Police Tweet Chilling Picture of What Happens After Guns Are Banned

That will lead to yet more hand-wringing coverage, anti-gun town hall meetings, and yet another wave of anti-gun hysteria liberals hope will sweep Democrats into power in November.

But this guy went off the script and spoke for millions of Americans who understand that when push comes to shove, they’d rather be capable of taking care of themselves and others than waiting for official help to arrive.

Naturally, social media users had a lot to say about it. There were quite a few liberals criticizing the guy, but there were a lot of sane people, too.

— Next Current Year (@next_current) April 4, 2018

 

No one can expect to see guys like this in the mainstream media’s coverage. Just like no one can expect the media analysis to dwell too much on the shooter’s background as an Iranian-born immigrant and radical animal rights activist who, according to Buzzfeed, was apparently a member of the local Bahai religious community in San Diego.

This witness went off script, but he described the reaction normal Americans would have in a situation where their lives and the lives of others were in danger: “I didn’t have a gun on me, but wish I did.”

And he was speaking for millions.

What do you think? Scroll down to comment below!

 

 

 

 

Watch: Muslim outrage in France After this video of a cop beating Burqa woman went viral

 

A Muslim provocation in Paris.

A Muslim woman refused to be identified and resisted arrest.

Policemen who were fed up with her, forcibly arrested her.

Muslims reacted with outrage after this video became viral.

Liberals and leftists in the West use the made up term “Islamophobia” to portray anyone who criticizes Islam as a “racist”.
They ignore the fact that Islam is an ideology that has nothing to do with race.

 

 

The list of European countries adopting Burqa and Niqab bans has gained a new member.

Countries that already had such a ban include

– France
– Belgium
– Netherlands
– Bulgaria
– Austria
– Denmark.
– Switzerland

Face-covering veils includes traditional headdresses like the burqa or nikab and other items concealing the face.

In countries that banned the full face veils it won’t be allowed in schools, hospitals, inside admin buildings, on public transport and other public places or buildings. The ban doesn’t prevent your head from being covered, just your face and identity.

Violators of tes ban could be fined up to 177 US dollars in Austria and up to €405 fine in the Netherlands.

In Muslim countries such as Iran, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan The Islamic veil symbolizes oppression of women under Sharia laws.
There is no mention of an Islamic veil or burqa in the Koran.

There are moderate Muslims who call to ban the burqa in the West.

 

 

Do you support Belgium’s right to deport illegal immigrants back to where they came from? Yes or No

Posted by ‎Support Israel – תמיכה בישראל‎ on Tuesday, April 3, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

Watch: Muslim leader "Trudeau government wants to bring Sharia Law Into Canada"

 

 

Top Muslim leader insists: “The Canadian government wants to bring Sharia Law”


Radical Muslim terrorists all over the world carry out terror attacks “in the name of Allah”.
They justify their violence by quoting verses from the Quran.


Most Muslims support Shari’a laws, according to the Sharia laws:


– There is no freedom of religion or freedom of speech.
– There is no equality between people (the non-Muslim is not equal to the Muslim).
– There are no equal rights for men and women.
– There is no democracy or a separation between religion and state politics.


Sharia is incompatible with Christian values.

 

 

Sharia is not only a law, but also a government ruled by Islamic values.


Since the beginning of his term, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has been constantly talking about “Islamophobia” which means fear of Islam.


It seems that Justin Trudeau is trying to limit freedom of speech by criminalizing criticism of Islam and the Prophet Muhammad, in countries such as Pakistan, Iran and Saudi Arabia it is called “Sharia blasphemy law”.


There are already anti-hate speech laws in Canada, and there is no need to give Islam a special status under Canadian law.


Justin Trudeau is discriminating against Islam by giving it special treatment over other religions.


Freedom of speech is a fundamental right in a Western democratic state.
Shari’a laws and blasphemy law are incompatible with Western values.
Trudeau ruled a failed immigration policy in Canada.


Justin Trudeau took 25,000 Syrian immigrants into Canada.


They were not brought out of Syria, they were brought out of a safe place (Turkey, Lebanon, Jordan) into Canada.


They are not really “refugees”.

After Trump announced his “Travel ban”, Prime Minister of Canada, Justin Trudeau wrote a post on Twitter and invited the immigrants to invade Canada illegally.


Now Canada is facing an immigration crisis, thanks to Justin Trudeau.
In his foreign policy, the situation is even worse.


Canadian PM Trudeau stabs Israel in the back by funding an Islamic UN agency in Gaza
UNRWA’s education program teaches children to be suicide bombers “in the name of Allah” and wage a war of jihad against the West.


During the 2014 war in Gaza, the UN found rockets and missile launchers hidden inside UNRWA schools.


Canada must stop funding Hamas schools in Gaza.


Every Western country has the right to defend itself, Canada must close its borders and deport illegal immigrants back to where they came from.

 

 

 

 

________________________________

 

Watch: Merkel admits that radical Muslims took control of certain parts of Germany “No-go areas do exist”

 

 

Angela Merkel admits there ARE Muslim ‘no-go’ areas in Germany that ‘nobody dares’ to enter.


“No-go areas” do exist in Germany, Angela Merkel admitted in an interview, adding that the arrival of “so many refugees” in the country “has raised multiple questions.”


She finally realizes that most of the refugees are fake, they are not refugees from Syria but illegal immigrants from all over the Muslim world.


Germany has the right to defend itself by closing its borders and deporting illegal immigrants back to where they came from.


The European Union’s open borders policy is a disaster.

 

 

The German government expects to spend around 93.6 billion euros by the end of 2020 on costs related to the refugee crisis.


Its the impact on housing, healthcare, the rising costs of welfare, schools that are brought under horrific burdens trying to teach an influx of children who don’t speak the Language yet fill up the classrooms and competing for already scarce jobs with workers who are willing to take less money for the same job – these are the day to day burgeoning effects of mass immigration. Populism has ONLY arisen because the elites of Europe have neglected their duty towards the very people that put them in power.


Instead of serving the people they have falsely assumed mastery over them and the people will simply not stand for it.


The only solution to the immigration crisis is to close the borders and deport illegal immigrants back to where they came from.


Most of the immigrants who arrived in Germany are not refugees from Syria. They are Muslim immigrants from Africa, Asia and the Middle East who exploited the flow of immigrants from Syria to invade Europe as “refugees.”


Multiculturalism has failed in Europe.


Most people are unaware of the consequences of the illegal mass immigration into Europe that lead to the changing face of Europe.


There are Western countries that do not even acknowledge that there is a lack of integration within the immigrant communities.


The Western world must close the borders before it is too late.

 

 

 

 

This is what they teach their children.
Is it a religion of peace? Yes or No

Posted by ‎Support Israel – תמיכה בישראל‎ on Tuesday, April 3, 2018

 

 

 

***************************

Rape crisis in Germany: women start arming themselves due to mass Islamic immigration!!!

 

 

This will Very well happen here in the United States!  If Mass Migrants infiltrate our Country!  NO NOT Allow the Loss of the  2nd amendment Right to own a GUN!!

All You Need To Know about Islam and their SHARIA LAW

 

German women have armed themselves with guns, “pepper spray is not enough,” they say.


Most of the migrants who infiltrate Germany illegally come from Muslim majority countries where they practiced sharia law.
In countries like Iran Saudi Arabia and Pakistan rape is the woman’s fault.


Under Sharia law a woman is considered half of a human being.


Sharia law are incompatible with Western laws.


Western countries must defend themselves by closing their borders and expelling illegal immigrants back to where they came from.
Every country has the right to defend itself.

 

 

The German government expects to spend around 93.6 billion euros by the end of 2020 on costs related to the refugee crisis.


Its the impact on housing, healthcare, the rising costs of welfare, schools that are brought under horrific burdens trying to teach an influx of children who don’t speak the Language yet fill up the classrooms and competing for already scarce jobs with workers who are willing to take less money for the same job – these are the day to day burgeoning effects of mass immigration. Populism has ONLY arisen because the elites of Europe have neglected their duty towards the very people that put them in power.


Instead of serving the people they have falsely assumed mastery over them and the people will simply not stand for it.


The only solution to the immigration crisis is to close the borders and deport illegal immigrants back to where they came from.


Most of the immigrants who arrived in Germany are not refugees from Syria. They are Muslim immigrants from Africa, Asia and the Middle East who exploited the flow of

immigrants from Syria to invade Europe as “refugees.”


Multiculturalism has failed in Europe.


Most people are unaware of the consequences of the illegal mass immigration into Europe that lead to the changing face of Europe.


There are Western countries that do not even acknowledge that there is a lack of integration within the immigrant communities.


The Western world must close the borders before it is too late.

 

 

 

 

 

What do you think about this?

Posted by ‎Support Israel – תמיכה בישראל‎ on Friday, March 30, 2018